http://myexs.ru/wp-content/themes/multiflex-4-10/img/header.gif
http://myexs.ru/wp-content/themes/multiflex-4-10/img/bg30.jpg

Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke

Дата: Июнь 12th, 2009 Автор:
+ Показать свойства документа
  • Тип контента: Научная статья
  • Номер документа: 6328
  • Название документа: Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke
  • Номер (DOI, IBSN, Патент): 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18
  • Изобретатель/автор: Kelly P Westlake, Carolynn Patten
  • Правопреемник/учебное заведение: University of California, San Francisco, University of Florida, Gainesville
  • Дата публикации документа: 2009-06-12
  • Страна опубликовавшая документ: США
  • Язык документа: Английский
  • Наименование изделия: Не заполнено
  • Источник: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Вложения: Да
  • Аналитик: Глаголева Елена

Background: While manually-assisted body-weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) has revealed improved locomotor function in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis, outcomes are inconsistent and it is very labor intensive. Thus an alternate treatment app-roach is desirable. Objectives of this pilot study were to: 1) compare the efficacy of body-weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) combined with the Lokomat robotic gait orthosis versus manually-assisted BWSTT for locomotor training post-stroke, and 2) assess effects of fast versus slow treadmill training speed. Methods: Sixteen volunteers with chronic hemiparetic gait (0.62 ± 0.30 m/s) post-stroke were randomly allocated to Lokomat (n = 8) or manual-BWSTT (n = 8) 3×/wk for 4 weeks. Groups were also stratified by fast (mean 0.92 ± 0.15 m/s) or slow (0.58 ± 0.12 m/s) training speeds. The primary outcomes were self-selected overground wal-king speed and paretic step length ratio. Secondary outcomes included: fast overground walking speed, 6-minute walk test, and a battery of clinical measures. Results: No significant differences in primary outcomes were revealed between Lokomat and manual groups as a result of training. However, within the Lokomat group, self-selected walk speed, paretic step length ratio, and four of the six secondary measures improved (p = 0.04–0.05, effect sizes = 0.19–0.60). Within the manual group, only balance scores improved (p = 0.02, effect size = 0.57). Group differences between fast and slow training groups were not revealed (p ≥ 0.28). Conclusion: Results suggest that Lokomat training may have advantages over manual-BWSTT following a modest intervention dose in chronic hemiparetic persons and further, that our training speeds produce similar gait improvements. Suggestions for a larger randomized controlled trial with optimal study parameters are provided.

Категория: Научные статьи | Нет комментариев »

Комментарии

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *


Статистика

Категорий: 179
Статей всего: 2,003
По типу:
 Видео: 36
 Выдержка с форума: 1
 Контактные данные: 12
 Научная статья: 1388
 Не заполнено: 5
 Новостная статья: 317
 Обзор технологии: 42
 Патент: 219
 Тех.подробности: 34
 Тип: 1
Комментариев: 6,672
Изображений: 3,005
Подробней...

ТОР 10 аналитиков

    Глаголева Елена - 591
    Дмитрий Соловьев - 459
    Helix - 218
    Ридна Украина))) - 85
    Наталья Черкасова - 81
    max-orduan - 29
    Елена Токай - 15
    Роман Михайлов - 9
    Мансур Жигануров - 4
    Дуванова Татьяна - 3

Календарь

  • Июнь 2009
    Пн Вт Ср Чт Пт Сб Вс
    « Май   Июл »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
  • Авторизация

    Ошибка в тексте?

    Выдели её мышкой!

    И нажми Ctrl+Enter